bait bang bus

Join BaitBus for only $5.95 NOW!

 

Membership incl. full access to:

Bangbus|Baitbus|BoobSquad|BackRoomFacial|TrannyTrick|RealButts OlderLadies|KingChile|PublicAmateurs|BigMovieLand

 

 

 

Once upon a day in the van, we were on a search of a straight guy, when all of a sudden we meet MIke. "Perfect" This guy was quiet and all smiles. When we convince him to do some gay shit, Alan got happy as fuck to suck his dick and get fucked by him. Then just when I start plotting on how to get rid of him "Tina" (The driver) wants to keep him. That was so fucken funny to wacht this poor Mike ran out of the van scared as fuck... Just in case you see Mike in the streets of mismi, Please tell him he forgot his money... Thanks

Copyright 2003 Baitbus.com

 

Last Update: 08/05/2004
eople, but * telling *why* it might squick them might spoil the story for * others. It is also rude to use any code to describe your work if it does not apply within these guidelines. That is to say, "Hey, all those people who read romantic stories (yeah, right, both of us) should have their horizons exp bait bang bus ed by my great rape-&-torture story, so I'll label it (rom)." is vicious. So is doing the reverse. However, precedence should always be given to the feelings of the people who might be squicked over the people who might be looking for that sort of story. If the story feels like Mf, but the girl is [just} over the line into adulthood bait bang bus the man much older, then (Mf) as a warning is fair, even if it disappoints the people hoping for a girl of 14. Similarly: If you have a story which appears, at some point, to involve one of these "must" labels, then you should use the label. i.e. a story in which the man strangles the woman, she collapses in death, bait bang bus then--at the end--she gets up bait bang bus says: "That was the most realistic game yet," should be labeled (snuff)..RM 65 ******* PURPOSE The story code FAQ is needed to communicate certain aspects of the stories which may either repel some readers, greatly attract some readers, or both. If you see other particular aspects, you are free to suggest a code for them. Tou should be aware that the general position is:1 There are *way* to many codes, we should publish much fewer.2 The codes for *my* type of stories, however, are much too coarse a filter we need about twice as many about that type. [And I believe those opinions to be both correct for any particular type of story.] So there may well be a fairly strong resistance to adding finer distinctions to the codes for your sort of story. Finding how else the story codes might be interpreted [rom = in Roman times, zoo = two people fuck while visitng the zoo, reluc = she has to talk him into it, etc.] is a great game. It